Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Comparison: Benchmarks, Pricing & Speed (September 2026)

A head-to-head comparison of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) (google) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (google) on OrcaRouter — pricing, context window, latency, throughput and benchmark quality, side by side, so you can pick the right model for your workload.

Bottom line

On benchmark quality, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads the composite index.

Free to start · both models on one key · billed at provider cost, zero token markup

Both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview are available through the same OrcaRouter endpoint at provider cost with zero token markup, so switching between them is a one-line change and the numbers below are what you actually pay.

Read the full analysis

This comparison pulls live pricing, the published context window, and OrcaRouter's own latency and throughput measurements so you can weigh cost against performance for your specific workload rather than relying on a vendor's headline benchmark. The right choice almost always depends on the shape of your traffic — prompt length, how much text you generate, how latency-sensitive your users are, and how hard the reasoning is — so the sections below break the decision down one dimension at a time and end with a concrete recommendation. Wherever a metric is missing for one of the two models, that row is left out rather than guessed, so every claim here is backed by a real number.

At a glance

  • Quality10.0Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 100%
  • Context1MGemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1500%

Model comparison

Pricing, context, latency, throughput and quality for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
MetricNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewTakeaway
Input $/M$2.00
Output $/M$12.00
Context66K1MGemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts a 1500% larger context window than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview).
p50 latency10000 ms
Throughput500 tok/s
Quality5.010.0Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 100% higher than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) on the composite quality index.

On benchmark quality, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads the composite index.

Both models, one API key. Start on either and switch by changing one string.

Get an API key

Use Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on one API key

You do not have to pick one. Both models are exposed through the same OpenAI-compatible endpoint on OrcaRouter, billed at the upstream provider's rate with zero token markup. Routing between them is a model-name change — no second account, no second SDK, no separate credentials.

That is what makes the trade-off above tractable in production: send the bulk of your traffic to whichever model wins the dimension you care about, reserve the other for the requests that need it, and move the split whenever your numbers change.

Hands-on test: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in Battle Mode

Battle Mode — try both, side-by-sideLive
Open in playground
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
·
Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
$2.00 /M · p50 10000ms

Pricing & cost analysis

One or both of these models does not expose per-token pricing here (it may be a free-tier, per-call, or not-yet-priced model), so treat the cost columns as indicative and confirm

Read the full analysis

the live rate on each model's own page before you budget against it.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) accepts up to 66K tokens of context and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts 1M.

Read the full analysis

The context window caps how much source material — documents, code, prior conversation — you can send in a single request. A larger window lets you skip chunking and retrieval plumbing for long inputs, but you still pay input-token rates for everything you send, so a bigger window is a capability, not a discount. Match the window to the longest single request your workload realistically produces rather than the largest number on the page. Also keep in mind that quality can degrade toward the end of a very long context on any model, so a large window is best treated as headroom for occasional long inputs rather than a licence to stuff every request to the limit.

Both rates are the raw provider price — OrcaRouter adds no markup, so the savings you compute are the savings you keep.

Start free

Speed & latency

Latency and throughput decide how the model feels in production. Median (p50) response latency is how long a typical request waits before the first token; throughput (tokens per second) sets how fast the answer streams once it starts.

Read the full analysis

For interactive chat and agent loops, low p50 latency matters most because the user is waiting on the first token; for batch generation and long-form output, throughput dominates the wall-clock time because the answer is long. The 7-day trend charts above show whether each model's latency is stable or drifting, which a single headline number hides — a model with a great average but a noisy tail can still miss a strict p95 SLA. If your product has a latency budget, read both the median and the shape of the curve, and remember that end-to-end latency also includes your network hop and any retrieval or tool calls you make around the model.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Benchmarks & quality

Benchmark scores approximate capability but are not a substitute for testing on your own prompts.

Read the full analysis

The composite indices shown here aggregate multiple public evaluations, and the percentile marks where each model lands against every comparable model in the catalog — a useful shortlist signal, not a guarantee for your task. A model that leads on a general intelligence index can still trail on your domain (coding, extraction, multilingual, long-context reasoning), so use the benchmarks to narrow the field, then run both models on a representative slice of your traffic. Pay attention to the specific index that matches your use case rather than the top-line number: a coding-heavy product should weight the coding index, a research assistant the reasoning index. Benchmarks also age as models are updated, so treat them as a starting hypothesis you confirm with your own evaluation set.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)
51.8
AA Coding
Better than 57% of models compared
#60 of 138
53.8
AA Intelligence
Better than 96% of models compared
#5 of 140
53.8
AA Math
Better than 29% of models compared
#58 of 82
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
68.8
AA Coding
Better than 75% of models compared
#30 of 138
30.4
AA Intelligence
Better than 62% of models compared
#49 of 140
Community head-to-head (Design Arena)Source: Design Arena Elo
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)1353Elo rating78.1% win rate
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview1346Elo rating70.3% win rate

In head-to-head community tournaments, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) holds the higher Elo rating (1353 versus 1346), meaning it wins more direct match-ups against comparable models.

Which should you choose?

If cost is the binding constraint, start with the cheaper model on your actual input-to-output mix and only move up if quality misses.

Read the full analysis

If responsiveness is the priority — user-facing chat, agents, anything where someone is waiting — weight p50 latency and throughput over a small price gap. If you are pushing the hardest reasoning, coding, or long-context work, let the benchmark and context-window winner lead and accept the higher rate where it pays for itself. Because both models sit behind the same API, the low-risk move is to route a fraction of real traffic to each and compare cost, latency, and answer quality on your own prompts before committing. A common pattern is to tier: send the bulk of easy, high-volume requests to the cheaper or faster model and reserve the stronger model for the requests that actually need it, which captures most of the quality upside at a fraction of the cost. Whichever you choose, keep the switch reversible — you can move traffic back the moment the numbers or your requirements shift.

Or don't choose — route per request across both, on one key and one endpoint.

Get both

Best for

  • Hardest reasoning & codingGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Longest inputsGemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview FAQ

Which has the larger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts the larger context window, so it fits longer documents and conversations in a single request.
Which scores higher on benchmarks, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads on the composite quality index shown above, but benchmark leads don't always transfer to a specific domain — validate on your own prompts before standardizing.
Which wins more head-to-head match-ups, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) holds the higher Design Arena Elo rating (1353 versus 1346), so it wins more blind head-to-head comparisons against comparable models.
Should I use Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?
Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview based on your priority: cost, context window, latency, or benchmark quality. The table above shows which model wins on each, so match the winner to the dimension that matters most for your workload.
How are Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview billed on OrcaRouter?
Both are billed at the upstream provider's rate with zero token markup — you pay the same per-token price you would pay the provider directly, through one OrcaRouter API key and endpoint.
Can I call both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with the same code?
Yes. Both are exposed through OrcaRouter's OpenAI-compatible API, so you change only the model name to route between them — no SDK swap, no separate credentials.

Start with Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

One key. Both models. 40+ providers.

Billed at provider cost with zero token markup. Start free, switch models with one string, and keep the decision reversible.

Create a free account